Circular 10/70 (1970)

In this circular, Edward Heath's Conservative government, with Margaret Thatcher as Education Secretary, allowed local authorities to decide whether or not to proceed with comprehensivisation, effectively cancelling Labour's Circular 10/65.

Labour later reinstated the request for comprehensivisation plans in Circular 4/74.

See also Circulars 10/65 and 4/74.

Circular 10/70 was prepared for the web by Derek Gillard and uploaded on 14 July 2017.


Circular 10/70 (1970)
The Organisation of Secondary Education

Department of Education and Science
London: 1970
© Crown copyright material is reproduced with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen's Printer for Scotland.


[page 1]

To Local Education Authorities
and the Governors of Direct
Grant, Voluntary Aided and
Special Agreement Schools

Circular 10/70
30 June 1970

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE, CURZON STREET, LONDON, W.1.

All communications should be addressed to the PERMANENT UNDER-SECRETARY OF STATE

THE ORGANISATION OF SECONDARY EDUCATION

1. The Government's aim is to ensure that all pupils shall have full opportunities for secondary education suitable to their needs and abilities. The Government, however, believe it is, wrong to impose a uniform pattern of secondary organisation on local education authorities by legislation or other means. Circular 10/65 is accordingly withdrawn. Consequential restrictions on the character of secondary building projects will no longer apply.

2. Authorities will now be freer to determine the shape of secondary provision in their areas. The Secretary of State will expect educational considerations in general, local needs and wishes in particular and the wise use of resources to be the main principles determining the local pattern. Recent rapid changes in secondary school organisation have in many areas imposed considerable strains within the education system. Where a particular pattern of organisation is working well and commands general support the Secretary of State does not wish to cause further change without good reason.

3. Authorities which have had reorganisation plans approved by the Department may either proceed to operate them unchanged or notify the Department of their wish to modify them. Those with plans currently lodged with the Department are invited to say whether they wish to have them further considered or to withdraw them. The Secretary of State will be pleased to consider any new plans which may be submitted. Officers of the Department will be available for consultation at any stage at which this would be helpful.

4. Whatever course local education authorities adopt the Secretary of State trusts that they will maintain close consultation with those representing the denominational and other voluntary schools in their area. Any proposed changes should also be discussed with the teachers. Full opportunities should be given to parents to make their views known before decisions are reached.


Herbert Andrew